Jisho

×
60eb5ee3b5691445351b1b9065d1b8b5
7 Replies ・ Started by MetroCello at 2018-11-26 18:21:18 UTC ・ Last reply by shuben at 2018-12-02 02:12:24 UTC
This is a discussion about

Differences in font/script?

I have a question regarding this kanji: I have seen it printed in two different ways that seem fairly dissimilar. Some versions have a vertical stroke on the left that connects to the horizontal line stroke on the bottom. Does anyone know the reason for this? Perhaps someone can proffer a brief explanation? I've seen it as a stand-alone character on a book tag... what does it mean in that context?

D58115c75cd794995de216e2831d7ee6
wareya at 2018-11-27 11:24:50 UTC

If a font doesn't render this character the same way as jisho's stroke order diagram then it's probably a Chinese font.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Han_unification

F18b3ee454796c70e62a0116f5685d66
shuben at 2018-11-27 20:33:18 UTC

豎直 vertical differs from 垂直 perpendicular.

直 another font cannot be shown here, means 豎 such as plant 植物. Since tree is vertical by nature, 樹 tree shares a symmetrical 豆 with 豎. 植 misses symmetry.
直 relates to 垂
both fonts are needed.

83653a964d1ebf1dff492aa188412614
jakobd2 at 2018-11-30 14:56:38 UTC

"If a font doesn't render this character the same way as jisho's stroke order diagram then it's probably a Chinese font."

I'm pretty sure this is not the case. I have several fonts on my system that I'm pretty are for Japanese, and they look like this: https://imgur.com/a/AlbNaxu
So I think both versions exist in Japanese.

D58115c75cd794995de216e2831d7ee6
wareya at 2018-11-30 16:49:39 UTC

Those are all the same as the stroke order diagram.

The spike in the bottom left corner is a decoration.

83653a964d1ebf1dff492aa188412614
jakobd2 at 2018-12-01 19:00:51 UTC

Ok I looked this character up in a Chinese dictionary. I realize now you're talking about a different stroke than the one I was thinking about.

F18b3ee454796c70e62a0116f5685d66
shuben at 2018-12-02 02:12:24 UTC

Here is my video on direct 直接:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdaRbpLNQXE&t=51s

to reply.