女王対ヴァン・デル・ピート
1. R. v. Van der PeetR. v. Van der Peet, [1996 1996] 2 S.C.R. 507 is a leading case on aboriginal rights under section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982. The Supreme Court held that aboriginal fishing rights did not extend to commercial selling of fish. From this case came the Van der Peet test for determining if an aboriginal right exists. This is the first of three cases known as the Van der Peet trilogy which included R. v. N.T.C. Smokehouse Ltd. and R. v. Gladstone.
Read “R. v. Van der Peet” on English Wikipedia
Read “女王対ヴァン・デル・ピート” on Japanese Wikipedia
Read “R. v. Van der Peet” on DBpedia
Read “R. v. Van der Peet” on English Wikipedia
Read “女王対ヴァン・デル・ピート” on Japanese Wikipedia
Read “R. v. Van der Peet” on DBpedia
Discussions
Log in to talk about this word.