Sombrero1
at 2025-04-13 08:00:56 UTC
Yes, seems to be a (rather rare) nanori:
https://mnamae.jp/kanji/304d3051.html
It could however also be a very old and rare reading. But that's probably less likely
You can email: jimbreen@gmail.com with an inquiry of correction request. He manages the kanjidic project
Sombrero1
at 2025-04-13 13:47:58 UTC
Most definitely not an onyomi. I checked its entry in the 大漢和辞典 and there are only きつ；こち；き；け；こつ, no きけ. Must be a mistake then
Log in to reply.
wrong reading for 乞
ke is an onyomi but kike is not